Notes from An Alien

~ Explorations In Reading, Writing & Publishing ~

Back to Our Conversations ~ What the Heck Is Privishing?


Privishing vs Publishing The Monday/Wednesday Conversations idled for a bit; but last Wednesday’s post, The Conversation Is Still Fizzling . . ., got things going again.

My part of the Conversation was about the two most common ways to publish—Traditional and Self-Publishing.

A regular reader picked up on a particular term used in one of the excerpts; and, this particular reader is a traditionally published author:

“I am astonished to read the word ‘privishing’. I have never heard of it before but I do believe I have experienced it! Many traditional publishers I believe use freelance editors who work on contract now. I think many now famous books which were perhaps published in a quieter and slower age would have sunk without a trace if they had experienced today’s privishing.”

And, from the text-link in that reader’s comment, a working definition for Privishing could be:

“…when a publisher intentionally suppresses a book that might be embarrassing and that they may have published in the first place. They might do that by printing as few copies as possible, for instance, so that it is instantly out of print. Or the book may be made scarce by buying large quantities of it in the shops, once it has gone out to retail outlets…”

Just to clarify, privishing happens, primarily, in Traditional publishing.

So, since that reader/author focused on the practice of Privishing, I did a bit more research…

I found a forum topic, from 2004, called: “Privishing” books: how much the truth hurts, and costs.

And, even though it focuses on journalism, the ideas certainly apply to fictional works.

Excerpts:

“From Gerald Colby’s essay in Into the Buzzsaw: Leading Journalists Expose the Myth of a Free Press:

“‘In the thirty years I have been a freelance investigative journalist, I’ve seen books suppressed in varying ways, sometimes by the subjects of books, sometimes by publishers, and sometimes by authors succumbing to self-censorship out of fear of repercussions for telling the truth. In the 1970s, a new term came into the vernacular of industry-wise writers: privishing.'”

“Serious research into America’s hidden history is not big business. Most big publishing houses, for one reason or another, will either reject a title altogether or privish the run. Hard truths are often left to the alternative presses, as with alternative media, which keeps them hidden from most Americans. And when they’re not, they’re often privished and priced out of reach.”

Another definition I found:

Small-scale or unadvertised publication of a book, so that it is not easily available to the public.

When it’s worded that way, privishing could be applied to a self-publishing author who’s afraid or incapable of getting the word out…

If you happen to be a “privishing” self-publisher, do, please, check out this article: Be the Gateway.

And, if you want to read an in-depth article on how Traditional Publishing can be manipulated into “banning” books, read, Behind the Forbidden Bookshelf: Du Pont Dynasty by Gerard Colby.

So, if you want to move this particular Conversation forward, feel free to leave any comments you care to share…

And, if you don’t see any reason to comment on this post, perhaps you could leave an idea (or, two) in the comments on what you’d like to see in our Conversations :-)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you don’t see a way to comment (or, “reply”) after this post, try up there at the top right…
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Visit The Story Bazaar
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Best Source for “Book Promotion” Ideas
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ My Bio
Google Author Page
For Private Comments or Questions, Email: amzolt {at} gmail {dot} com

3 responses to “Back to Our Conversations ~ What the Heck Is Privishing?

  1. Barbara Blackcinder March 20, 2018 at 6:52 am

    Does it ever make sense for a book publishing company to suppress a book, not to mention that it is contrary to their very reason for existence? It speaks to the arrogance of such companies and individuals who think that they know what will sell, and more importantly, what the public wants to read. They have been proven to be completely wrong in many cases and will continue to practice their arrogance despite this fact.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Pingback: The Conversation Continues ~ the Issues with Traditional Publishing . . . | Notes from An Alien

What Are *Your* Thoughts or Feelings?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.